LG UltraGear OLED 31.5″ 4K HDR 240 Hz Gaming Monitor

3.6
Based on 43 customer reviews
7
4
7
5
20

Customer Reviews Summary

The LG UltraGear OLED 31.5″ 4K HDR 240 Hz Gaming Monitor has garnered a range of reviews from customers, highlighting both its standout features and areas where it falls short. Users have praised the monitor for its stunning OLED display quality, fast response times, and versatile dual-mode functionality, which allows for seamless switching between 4K 240Hz and 1080p 480Hz modes. The overall design, including its sleek appearance and adjustable stand, has also been well-received. However, some users have expressed dissatisfaction with specific aspects such as the matte coating on the screen, which they feel diminishes the vibrancy of the display, and the absence of features like USB-C ports and built-in KVM switches. Additionally, there have been complaints about customer service experiences and issues related to product delivery.

PROS

  • Stunning Display Quality: “The OLED panel makes everything pop out with richer colors with more detail, especially with the inky blacks OLED gives out,” noted a user.
  • Fast Response Times: With a 0.03ms response time, users have praised the monitor’s performance in high-speed gaming scenarios, making it ideal for competitive play.
  • Dual-Mode Functionality: The ability to switch between 4K 240Hz and 1080p 480Hz modes is highly appreciated by gamers who want flexibility in their display settings.
  • Versatile Design: Users have commented on the sleek, almost borderless design and the sturdy, adjustable stand that supports various viewing angles and orientations.
  • Good Built-in Speakers: The monitor’s built-in speakers have been described as surprisingly good for a monitor, offering decent sound quality for both gaming and general use.

CONS

  • Matte Coating: Many users feel the matte coating dulls the display’s vibrancy. “The matte finish on the screen seems to take away from some of its beauty,” mentioned a reviewer.
  • High Price: Several reviews pointed out that the monitor is overpriced. “At $1500, it feels more like a $1000 monitor,” one user stated, highlighting the high cost relative to its features.
  • Missing Features: The absence of USB-C ports and a KVM switch has been a common complaint. “The lack of USB-C 140W connection is a terrible oversight,” noted a reviewer.
  • Customer Service Issues: Some users have reported poor customer service experiences, particularly with in-store assistance and product delivery.
  • HDR Performance: A few users have found the HDR performance lacking, with peak brightness not meeting expectations and issues like black level crush being noted.

Who Should Buy?

This monitor is particularly suitable for gamers who demand high performance and flexibility in their display settings. The fast response times and dual-mode functionality make it ideal for competitive gamers who switch between high-resolution and high-refresh-rate modes. Additionally, those who prioritize having a stunning OLED display for immersive gaming and content consumption will find this monitor highly appealing. However, due to its high price point and the lack of certain features, it may not be the best choice for those looking for a comprehensive work-and-play monitor solution.

Recommendations

Based on the majority of reviews, users generally recommend this monitor for its exceptional display quality and performance in gaming scenarios. Despite some drawbacks like the matte coating and high price, many believe that the pros outweigh the cons, particularly for those who can afford the investment. Users who highly value image quality and performance in their gaming setup are likely to appreciate this monitor, while those looking for more feature-rich options at a lower price point might want to consider alternatives.

Check it out on Amazon

See the latest pricing for LG ‎32GS95UE 32-inch Ultragear OLED Gaming Monitor UHD 240Hz 0.03ms DisplayHDR True Black 400 AMD FreeSync Premium Pro NVIDIA G-Sync HDMI 2.1 DisplayPort Tilt/Height/Swivel Stand Black on Amazon

Customer Reviews

Updated on December 7, 2024

Showing 110 reviews of 43 reviews.

Sort by
Filter by
mauriceMarch 2, 2024

One of the worst matte coatings I’ve ever seen on an monitor. (LG 32GS95UE)

It should be illegal to charge this much for a fuzzy display.
The 1080p 480hz mode didn’t look as bad as I was expecting, but that doesn’t matter since this monitor is going back.

Gallery Image
TannerMarch 19, 2024

TO THE PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE 1080p 480HZ

The picture WILL be fuzzy if you have it set to fit 32 inches. The whole point of the 1080p 480hz is for fast-paced games like Call of Duty and most people run that on a 27 or 24-inch monitor. That means you’re supposed to step the monitor down to 27 or 24 inches. The full 32-inch mode should only be used for the 4k setting. So if you want the 1080p 480hz to look good, You have to step the monitor down. That’s not an “issue with the monitor.” It’s like that on purpose.

KevinPMay 2, 2024

HDR clips at 600 in W11 & black levels are crush

The HDR clips at 600 in games & the Windows calibration app on W11 w/ Gamer 1/2 modes. The only time you can get HDR above 600 in Windows is if you use RTS/FPS/Vivid mode where it locks you out off multiple picture settings, raises to sharpness to terrible levels (can’t adjust it), has absolute terrible colors & applies some sort of DTM where it will then clip at 2800. Clearly not normal.

HDR also introduces black crush. This can be confirmed w/ a black level NIT test pattern made for HDR via YouTube. You can also confirm this in the Windows HDR calibration app where the image will disappear even at 0.1150. The black level image is supposed to disappear at .0100 like every other LG OLED. The only way to fix this is to raise black stabilizer from 50 to 75+ but then it raises all black levels to IPS like levels.

Rushed to the market. These issues need to be address in a firmware update. Extremely disappointed.

Gallery Image
gochichiApril 25, 2024

Too pricey, design oversights and missing features

LG has decided to play at making a monitor as a hobby instead of a market dominant, fully worked out and mass produced item.

Availability constraints hide its horrific pricing. The lack USB-C 140W connection (or even 90W, or even 65W) is a terrible oversight. Most of us in this price market have both a high end laptop of more, and a desktop.

I have this money, but these are games being played. Then we have a gamified availability of an overpriced product. Honestly, if it had a serious way to connect my MacBooks as well as my RTX 4090 I would have held my nose. This item was designed for the discount bin six months down the line. It’s sad that LG decided to not obliterate and disrupt the entire monitor market. That price is $999. And that missing feature is USB-C connectivity.

KG21May 3, 2024

Needs to be updated

The monitor has clear issues with HDR and caps at 600 peak brightness despite being on high mode. The monitor also states it is GSync compatible, but in Nvidia control panel, the display shows up as not certified. For the price, you’d expect a better finished product.

TonyTMay 14, 2024

Im sure its nice, but don’t buy from BestBuy

I am extremely disappointed with the service I received. My $1,500 package, which was supposed to require a signature upon delivery, was incorrectly left in a different building without any signature. The item was in the OEM box, which clearly displayed it as a high-end monitor, making it an obvious target for theft. Despite the clear error, Best Buy has refused to take responsibility, leaving me with a $1,500 charge and no monitor. This has been a very frustrating experience.

BravosvtApril 25, 2024

LG 32in oled

Returned. Matte coating finish on screen looks horrible. For this price should have an option for glossy also. May not be a deal breaker for some. Also no usb c ports.

BitcoinMay 4, 2024

Not worth the money, Returning this coming week

Shipped in manufacture boxs, received heavily damaged! Paying over a grand for a monitor at least have the decency to ship it in an additional brown box($2 cost) for protection of any element it encounters on it’s journey to the retail purchasers home. We have the samsung 49” oled and the quality is so much better clear and crisper! Returning the LG this coming week

Gallery ImageGallery ImageGallery ImageGallery Image
milesk182April 27, 2024

Good but prices too high

I ended up keeping the MSI QDOLED instead. The Matte isn’t an issue and i would argue the text is better with LG and the WOLED tech. Its not as broght in real HDR as the QDOLED. The 480hz is cool but at 1080p its just meh. This things issue is really its price. The MSI was $900 and looks comparible if not better. Personal preference. This monitor isnt as bright as LGs other new oleds which is weird.

EliteA1April 25, 2024

Matte is fine and 480 OLED is close to ULMB/Dyac

Someone wrote a 1 star review before they physically even had the product as it launched through bestbuy just one day ago. The matte coating is fine and barely noticeable. I own the 2k 360hz glossy QD OLED and even prefer the matte to combat glare. I used backlight strobing for years but absolutely love the quality of OLED. 480hz gets pretty close to my 540 with strobing.

Help Us Improve!